Really, people; is there *anyone* still out there doubting that we need to do something big and act fast if we want to avoid fucking up the planet?
The data keeps coming in from the world's top scientists and some still want to live in denial. First it was, "it's not real." Piles of data later, "okay, it's real but it's not man-made." From the new report:
The report leaves no doubt that man-made emissions from the burning of fossil fuels (and, to a lesser extent, deforestation) have been responsible for the steady rise in atmospheric temperatures.
Okay, both man-made. Next it will be, "oh but nothing can be done" or "it wont be enough" or "we're not going to tighten our carbon-footprint belt unless China does too" or some other sort of petty squabbling while we continue to ignore the problem. They've already told us what we need to do, so let's do it. What happened to the Americans who kicked ass and got things done. What, are we all too busy going to the mall and worrying about Britney Spears custody?
Sure, whatever we do may still not be enough but any improvement is for the better. It's not a win or lose proposition -- it's a sliding scale of how much are we going to lose. I vote for less! And yes, if China doesn't join in it will be harder; but again, better is better. We can't wait for everyone to join in before we start making improvements.
Sure it's going to be painful in the short run but it's going to be much worse in the long run if we don't! And as someone wisely pointed out -- we don't have another planet to run the test on or to move to when we ruin this one!
Another common bit of denial is that it won't be that bad. "The Earth probably has some way of adjusting that we just don't understand." Maybe, but since we don't know we really can't take that risk. Oh, and the Earth doesn't really give a hill of beans about little ol' homo sapiens so it has no interest in keeping things cozy for us. It would probably be better off if we were gone.
"Besides, what's a few degrees?" Well, our best estimates are that a 3 degree change will cause the loss of about 25% of all plants and animal species, while a 6 degree change could wipe out about 50% of all species. This sounds serious to me! Plus, if the Greenland ice sheet melts then we'll also lose the reflective benefit from the white ice and the planet will absorb even more heat. Should that happen, scientists aren't even sure what this would do to sea levels and overall weather patterns. If we're having trouble feeding everyone today and already have numerous unsustainable practices that are depleting our food supply (suggesting that we already have a resource problem), what will we do when the weather and the bees and the
refuse to cooperate? We may have to learn to love Soylent Green.
“What we do in the next two or three years will define our future.”